Leyla Şahin v Turkey
96% semantic match
Higher education, secularism and national context support a wider margin, subject to European supervision.
YOUR OLD NOTEI was treating wide margin as automatic deference.
Eweida v United Kingdom
94% semantic match
The Court found a violation and held that too much weight had been given to British Airways' corporate image.
Ahmet Arslan v Turkey
91% semantic match
The applicants were ordinary citizens in public space rather than representatives exercising public authority. The restriction was not justified on the facts.
S.A.S. v France
The Grand Chamber accepted a wide margin in the context of the face-covering ban and the stated aim of protecting the conditions of “living together”.
Your provenance
“Wide margin = inconsistent protection.”
“What stops deference becoming inconsistent?”
“I need to stop treating the margin as fixed.”