HUMAN RIGHTS
ARTICLE 9 - MARGIN OF APPRECIATION
3 - SEMANTIC SOURCE™

Connect the source to what I thought it meant.

SEMANTIC SOURCE™ - SS-A9-014

§109 - religious expression differs according to time and context.

§110 - national discretion remains paired with European supervision.

The source text stays attached to the student's interpretation without becoming the interpretation.

Semantic Context

Context → width of margin → national discretion → Strasbourg supervision → proportionality.
MY FIRST ROUTEWide margin = inconsistent protection.
CORRECTIONI was treating the margin as a fixed level of deference. The cases suggest its width changes with context. My criticism needs reconstructing, not deleting.
Connected secondary source
Konstantina Alexopoulou - Oxford Journal of Law and Religion 11(2-3) (2022) 220-245

Useful for testing how subsidiarity and contextual factors affect the scope of the Article 9 margin.

Article 9
Context
Margin
Consensus
Supervision
Proportionality
YADAQ METHODCOLLISION preserves disconfirming sources. CORRECTION preserves the original thought and records how the framework changed.