HUMAN RIGHTS
ARTICLE 9 - MARGIN OF APPRECIATION
1 - CAPTURE

Keep the cases that challenge my first thought.

My Modules → Human Rights5 sources captured
Leyla Şahin v Turkey [GC]
Primary source - App no. 44774/98
Captured
Eweida and Others v United Kingdom
Primary source - App nos. 48420/10 and others
Captured
S.A.S. v France [GC]
Primary source - App no. 43835/11
Captured
Ahmet Arslan and Others v Turkey
Primary source - App no. 41135/98
Captured
Konstantina Alexopoulou - The Margin of Appreciation in Freedom of Thought, Conscience, and Religion under Article 9 of ECHR
Oxford Journal of Law and Religion 11(2-3) (2022) 220-245
Captured

COLLISION

My instinct: a wide margin lets states determine the level of Article 9 protection.
The cases do not all point in one direction. Strasbourg sometimes defers and sometimes intervenes.
MY NOTEI need to stop treating "the margin" as one fixed amount of deference.
WHY COLLISION MATTERSKeep the cases that complicate my first position before I settle the argument.
YADAQ METHODCOLLISION preserves disconfirming sources. CORRECTION preserves the original thought and records how the framework changed.
← Back