ESSAY QUESTION
The European Court of Human Rights often grants national governments wide discretion - known as the margin of appreciation - to decide how secularism or public order operates locally, leading to inconsistent rulings on religious symbols.
Interesting - need laterMy first thought
A wide margin seems to allow the same Article 9 right to receive different levels of protection in different states.
Question
Is that variation principled, or does the margin make protection unpredictable?
Article 9
secularism
deference